Abstract
Corresponding Author(s)
Cara O’Shaughnessey, DO, Ohio University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, 102 Grosvenor Hall, Athens, OH 45701.
E-mail address: carebear91780@gmail.com.
Read the article
A 44-year-old white female was found by her husband at home confused, shaking, and diaphoretic. The husband was alerted by one of her coworkers that she did not show up that morning for work. He took her immediately to her family physician’s office for evaluation, where her finger- stick glucose showed a reading of 24 mg/dL. She was given an oral glucose solution with subsequent return of her glucose level to 87 mg/dL and resolution of her symptoms. The patient stated that she had been experiencing similar episodes two to three times per month for the past 4 months. Her symptoms included disorientation, confusion, shaking, sweating, tunnel vision, and amnesia of the episode. Episodes typically occurred in the morning, lasted anywhere from 1 to 6 hours, and occurred without regard to meals. The symptoms were more frequent and severe during her menstrual cycle and they occurred more often when she was more physically active. Her symptoms were relieved with food.
She had no known medical problems or previous surgeries. Her only medication was a multivitamin daily and she did not take any supplements or prescription medications. Her family history was non-contributory, including no history of diabetes or other endocrine disorders. She did not smoke or use illicit drugs, usually consumed 1 to 2 glasses of wine per week, ate a relatively healthy diet, and exercised regularly. Review of systems was significant for lighthead- edness with exertion, with recent symptoms of unexplained weight gain (15 lbs) within the prior 3 months. Physical examination was essentially normal and did not reveal any orthostasis.
The patient was referred to an endocrinologist for eval- uation, given a glucometer to monitor her fingerstick glu- cose level sugars, and instructed to eat 6 regularly scheduled meals rich in carbohydrates during the day. She was also given glucose tabs and a prescription for a glucagon emer- gency kit. A lab slip for stat labs including glucose, insulin, C-peptide, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), prolactin, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, and com- prehensive metabolic panel was given to her and she was instructed to have the lab work done immediately during or after experiencing a hypoglycemic episode. Within one week, she had another symptomatic hypoglycemic episode, a fingerstick glucose reading was in the 50s, and she went to the laboratory. Results demonstrated a serum glucose of 66 mg/dL, insulin 4.4 µ,U/mL (normal 1-21 µ,U/mL), and C- peptide 3.7 ng/mL (normal 1-5.2 ng/mL). TSH, prolactin, ACTH, cortisol, liver function tests, creatinine, and electro- lytes were all normal. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the pituitary gland and pancreas with and without contrast were normal.
Patient course
She continued to have frequent hypoglycemic episodes for the next two weeks and was admitted to the hospital for a supervised 72-hour fast. On the second day of the fast, she awoke at 5:00 AM disoriented, confused, and sweating. Her blood glucose was 38 mg/dL, insulin was 3.9 µ,U/mL, proinsulin was 36 pg/mL (normal 3-20 pg/mL), and C-pep- tide was 6.1 ng/mL. Drug screens for sulfonylurea and repaglinide were negative. Because of the witnessed hypoglycemia under observation, further imaging was ordered. An endoscopic ultrasound demonstrated an enhancing heterogeneous 9.5-mm mass in the pancreatic tail, suggestive of an insulinoma.
She was prescribed diazoxide while awaiting evaluation by a neuroendocrine surgeon but continued to have frequent symptomatic hypoglycemic episodes. She subsequently underwent a spleen-sparing distal pancreatectomy with complete resection of the mass. Pathology confirmed a well differentiated insulin-secreting neuroendocrine neoplasm with no evidence of invasion or malignant features. Post- operatively, she has done very well, with complete resolution of her symptoms. She followed up with her endocrinologist two months postoperatively and had lost 20 lbs and was feeling well. She had no further episodes of hypoglycemia.
Topic review
Insulinomas are rare endocrine islet cell tumors that ectop- ically secrete insulin in a random and inappropriate pattern, resulting in spontaneous hypoglycemia. They are the most common functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and the most common cause of hypoglycemia resulting from endogenous hyperinsulinism.1-3 The estimated incidence is 1 case per 250,000 patient-years.1 The majority of insuli- nomas are benign (90%), sporadic (90%), solitary (90%), small (90% are >2 cm and 40% are <1 cm), hypervascular, and equally distributed throughout the pancreatic head, body, and tail.1,3,4 Approximately 10% are multiple, 10% are malignant, and 10% are familial, which are all associ- ated with MEN-1 (5-10% of all insulinoma cases).1-4 They are more common in women (2:1) and usually occur in the fifth or sixth decade of life. When an insulinoma is part of MEN-1, they are found more commonly in the third de- cade.3-5
Insulinomas should always be suspected in a healthy person presenting with spontaneous hypoglycemia, espe- cially if they occur at night, after fasting longer than 4 hours, or after exercise.1,2,4 The diagnostic criteria for an insulinoma includes when someone without diabetes or
other exacerbating condition presents with Whipple’s triad (which is considered pathognomonic) and includes: (1) Symptoms of neuroglycopenia; (2) documented hypoglyce- mia (plasma glucose levels <50 mg/dL); and (3) relief of symptoms once the plasma glucose level is restored.2,5 Neu- rogenic (or autonomic) hypoglycemic symptoms, which re- sult from the catecholaminergic response to hypoglycemia, commonly occur with plasma glucose concentrations be- tween 65 and 50 mg/dL and may include anxiety, tre- mor, nausea, hunger, sweating, palpitations, and paresthe- sias.2,4-6 Neuroglycopenic symptoms are the direct result of central nervous system glucose deprivation and usually be- come apparent once the plasma glucose falls below 45 mg/dL.2,5 These symptoms are more serious and may in- clude fatigue, lethargy, headache, visual changes, behav- ioral changes, confusion, disorientation, amnesia, seizure, loss of consciousness, and even death if the hypoglycemia is severe and prolonged.2,4,5 Some patients may develop hy- poglycemic unawareness similar to patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus as a result of central nervous system ad- aptation to the chronic hypoglycemia.7 Weight gain is com- mon and is usually the result of an overattempt to relieve symptoms of hypoglycemia with food ingestion.2,8
Other causes of hypoglycemia in healthy-appearing pa- tients should be considered and include noninsulinoma pan- creatogenous hypoglycemia syndrome (NIPHS), insulin- or sulfonylurea-induced factitious hypoglycemia, strenuous exercise, and ketotic hypoglycemia.2,7 Severe liver disease, thyrotoxicosis, alcoholism, poor nutrition, or other extra pancreatic tumors should also be considered as a possible etiologies of fasting hypoglycemia.4 It has been estimated that 20% of patients with an insulinoma are initially misdi- agnosed with a psychiatric, seizure, or other neurologic disorder.9 The mean delay between onset of continuous symptoms and diagnosis of an insulinoma is about 4 to 7 years.4
Diagnostic evaluation
Although the most characteristic feature of an insulinoma is fasting hypoglycemia, diagnosis cannot be made solely on the presence of hypoglycemia documented by a glucose meter measurement or on the resolution of symptoms re- lieved with food ingestion. The diagnosis of an insulinoma requires the demonstration of an inappropriately elevated plasma insulin level in the presence of spontaneous, symp- tomatic hypoglycemia. Diagnostic evaluation can include an overnight fast, an extended outpatient fast, or an inpatient 72-hour fast, which is the safest and most preferred method of evaluation.2,4,5 The 72-hour inpatient fast involves hos- pitalization of the patient, as well as proper education of the nursing staff about the protocol and how to obtain the appropriate labs and treat the hypoglycemia when and if the patient does meet the criteria of a glucose level below 60 mg/dL with symptoms (many normal individuals glucose
levels can drop into the 50s without symptoms or conse- quences). Patients are allowed to drink calorie- and carbo- hydrate-free liquids, and physical activity should be encour- aged. Supplies for venipuncture and an ampule of D50 should be at the bedside for rapid response when and if the patient develops symptomatic hypoglycemia. Blood glucose levels are measured every 4 to 8 hours initially, and every 1 to 2 hours when the blood glucose levels fall to 60 mg/dL.4,5 The fast rarely takes 72 hours to complete because approx- imately 70% to 80% of patients develop hypoglycemia during the first 24 hours and 98% develop it by 48 hours.2,4 If the patient becomes symptomatic at any point or if the blood glucose level falls below 45 to 55 mg/dL and the patient has symptoms of hypoglycemia, the test should be terminated and labs drawn. Labs include glucose, insulin, proinsulin, C-peptide, beta hydroxybutyrate, and sulfonyl- urea levels.2,4,5 Autoantibodies to insulin should be mea- sured as part of the initial evaluation when ruling out other causes of hypoglycemia but are not required at the time of hypoglycemia.5 If symptomatic hypoglycemia does not oc- cur, the fast should be continued for the full 72 hours. Once the labs are drawn, refeeding, an ampule of D50 IV, or 1 mg of intravenous or subcutaneous glucagon can be given and blood glucose levels should be measured after 10, 20, and 30 minutes.2,10 Biochemical diagnosis of an insulinoma can be established when the following criteria are met: (1) Blood glucose levels below 45 to 55 mg/dL with hypogly- cemic symptoms; (2) inappropriately high insulin levels (>3 U/mL or >18 pmol/L) and proinsulin levels (>5 pmol/ L); (3) elevated C1-peptide levels (>0.6 ng/mL or >0.2 nmol/L); and (4) absence of serum sulfonylurea.2,4,5 A high insulin and low C1-peptide suggests exogenous insulin administration.11 A low C1 is important to exclude the presence of sulfonylurea ingestion, which can produce a biochemical profile similar to an insulinoma. Beta-hydroxy- butyrate levels should be low if hyperinsulinemia is present and the measurement is often useful in cases with borderline insulin and C-peptide results.11
Localization of insulinomas
The recommended treatment for an insulinoma is complete surgical resection of the tumor. This is curative in the majority of the cases without benign pathology.7,12 Al- though not required for diagnosis, preoperative localization with imaging optimizes the planning of a successful surgi- cal approach.2 Noninvasive imaging techniques including transabdominal ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be help- ful in detecting insulinomas.1,2,12 MRI is superior to CT and US, especially for the detection of metastases before sur- gery.7 When noninvasive techniques fail to localize a tumor, invasive techniques should be considered such as selective arteriography, transhepatic portal-venous sampling, endo- scopic US (EUS), and intraoperative US (IOUS).1-3,11 In-
traoperative IOUS and careful palpation of the pancreas remain the most reliable way to localize insulinomas, with almost 100% sensitivity in the detection of tumors.13 In addition to preoperative localization before surgery, it is also necessary to test for the presence of MEN-1 including primary hyperparathyroidism and pituitary tumors.3
Medical therapy aimed at preventing hypoglycemia can be used before surgery and in cases in which surgery is not done. Medications used to control blood glucose levels include diazoxide, verapamil, phenytoin, and oc- treotide.3,4,8,14 The most effective drug for controlling hy- poglycemia is diazoxide (50-300 mg/d with a maximum of 600 mg/d), which suppresses insulin secretion by direct action on the beta cells and by enhancing glycogenolysis. The combination of diazoxide along with small, frequent meals is most often used to control the hypoglycemia before surgery.4,12
Laparoscopic enucleation is the procedure of choice for all benign insulinomas, although the accuracy of this tech- nique can only be achieved in centers with a significant case load of neuroendocrine tumors and a skilled surgeon in laparoscopic and pancreatic surgery.2,15 Other surgical pro- cedures such as partial distal pancreatectomy; a Whipple procedure (removal of the head of the pancreas, gastrec- tomy, duodenectomy, and splenectomy); and total pancre- atectomy have all been reported but have higher complica- tion rates.2 Once the insulinoma is entirely resected and the patient is considered completely cured, periodic follow-up is important, especially for patients with malignant insuli- nomas and those with MEN-1. It is also important that blood glucose levels be measured frequently during hospitaliza- tion and once daily after the patient’s discharge. It is not uncommon for blood glucose levels to be elevated up to 200 to 400 mg/dL for a period of several days to several weeks after surgery, and small doses of insulin should be admin- istered in these cases.2
Conclusions
The evaluation of a suspected insulinoma is fairly straight forward and includes the exclusion of other endocrine causes of hypoglycemia (adrenal insufficiency, panhypopi- tuitarism, etc.) and differentiation from fictitious hypogly- cemia. The 72 hour medically supervised fast is the most appropriate diagnostic approach which can be done in any hospital if the staff is trained properly. This review should help the primary care physician understand the process and enable them to establish the diagnosis quite confidently if they wish to pursue the diagnosis themselves.
References
Cryer PH: Chapter 33. Glucose homeostasis and hypoglycemia. In: Krokenberg HM, et al (editor). Williams’ Textbook of Endocrinology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2008, pp 1503-1528
Vaidakis D, Karoubalis J, Pappa T, et al: Pancreatic insulinoma: current issues and trends. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 9:234-241, 2010
Abood GJ, Go A, Malhotra D: The surgical and systemic management of neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Surg Clin North Am 89: 249-266, 1999
Fauci AC, Braunwald E, Kasper DL: General features of gastrointes- tinal neuroendocrine tumors. In: Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, et al (editors). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 17th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp ***
Cryer PE: Hypoglycemia. In: Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, et al (editors). In: Harrison’s Principles of Internal Med- icine. 17th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp 2305-2310
Dizon AM, Kowalyk S, Hoogwerf BJ: Neuroglycopenic and other symptoms in patients with insulinomas. Am J Med 106:307-310, 1999
Placzkowski KA, Vella A, Thompson GB, et al: Secular trends in the presentation and management of functioning insulinoma at the Mayo Clinic, 1987-2007. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:1069-1073, 2009
Service FJ: Recurrent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia caused by an insulin- secreting insulinoma. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2:467-470, 2006
Service FJ, Dale AJ, Elveback LR, et al: Insulinoma: clinical and diag- nostic features of 60 consecutive cases. Mayo Clin Proc 51:417-429, 1976
Grant CS: Gastrointestinal endocrine tumours. Insulinoma. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 10:645-671, 1996
Chammas NK, Teale JD, Quin JD: Insulinoma: how reliable is the biochemical evidence. Ann Clin Biochem 40:689-693, 2003
Jani N, Moser AJ, Khalid A: Pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastroen- terol Clin North Am 36:431-439, 2007
Galiber AK, Reading CC, Charboneau JW, et al: Localization of pancreatic insulinoma: comparison of pre- and intraoperative US with CT and angiography. Radiology 166:405-408, 1988
Service FJ, McMahon MM, O’Brien PC, et al: Functioning insuli- noma—incidence, recurrence, and long-term survival of patients: a 60-year study. Mayo Clin Proc 66:711-719, 1991
Zografos GN, Vasiliadis G, Karoubalis J, et al: Laparoscopic resection of insulinoma after endoscopic ultrasonography tattooing. Am Surg 76:446-448, 2010