Read the article

Re: Approach and management of spider bites for the primary care physician (Ashurst et al. Osteopathic Family Physician 3(4):149-153, 2011)

To the Editor:

In the article “Approach and management of spider bites for the primary care physician” by Ashurst et al, the overall message stated in the conclusion was correct, although the introduction had a significant error. The statement with reference number 4 (Bennett and Vetter) should have read differently. The exact quote is “In North America, many medical conditions that cause dermonecrosis have been mis- diagnosed as the effects of bites from brown recluse or other spiders, and fully 80% of spider-bite diagnoses are errone- ous.” In addition, there are no species of spiders that have been identified as poisonous; they are all venomous, al- though most venom is species-specific and harmless to mammals.

As I stated in a letter to the editor in the October 1, 2007 issue of American Family Physician, spider bites do occur, but they are the exception and not the rule. Please refer to my letter as well as Reitz’s and the authors’ reply.

John J. Kemerer, DO Campus Care Medical Director Assistant Professor of Family Medicine

Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine Ohio University, Athens, Ohio


Reply

To the Editor:

We greatly appreciate the comment from Dr Kemerer about our recent article on spider bites. Dr Kemerer points out a valid statement by saying that the quote “However, 80% of spider bite diagnoses are missed due to the relative lack of toxicity seen in the patient and a presumptive diag- nosis of a skin infection is made” is inaccurate. According

to Bennett and Vetter, “In North America, many medical conditions that cause dermonecrosis have been misdiag- nosed as the effects of bites from brown recluse or other spiders, and fully 80% of spider-bite diagnoses are errone- ous.”1 Moreover, Suchard has shown that 85.7% of patients presenting to the emergency department with a presumed spider bite were diagnosed with an infectious process.2

Second, a poison is defined as a substance that, when ingested, inhaled, absorbed, injected into, or developed within the body, will cause damage to structures of the body and impair or destroy their function.3 Although a venom is defined as a toxic fluid substance secreted by some snakes, arthropods, and other animals and transmitted by their stings or bites,3 the distinction between poisonous and ven- omous is how the substance is delivered. Current teaching is that although spiders are venomous, they should be labeled poisonous only if they make the patient ill after ingestion. Neither the black widow nor brown recluse are poisonous; however, both are venomous.

We would like to thank Dr Kemerer for acknowledging the inaccurate reference and providing a valid argument for whether a spider should be classified as poisonous or ven- omous.

John Ashurst, DO Matt Cook, DO

Departments of Emergency Medicine and Toxicology

Lehigh Valley Health Network Bethlehem, Pennsylvania


References

  1. Bennett RG, Vetter RS: An approach to spider bites. Erroneous attri- bution of dermonecrotic lesions to brown recluse or hobo spiders in Canada. Can Fam Physician 50:1098-1101, 2004

  2. Suchard JR: “Spider Bite” lesions are usually diagnosed as skin and soft-tissue infections. J Emerg Med 41:473-481, 2011

  3. Mosby’s Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Professions. St. Louis, M