Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Family-based approaches have proven successful in the treatment of adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN). This observational study aimed to demonstrate that a family physician with a multidisciplinary team, using a family-based approach, could successfully treat adolescents with and at risk for AN.

METHODS: Retrospective data was obtained for 9 young women, including age, gender, height, weight, and status of menstruation. Ideal body weight (IBW) and 85% IBW were calculated at each visit.

RESULTS: Eight participants remained in the program and achieved 85% IBW, while remaining above 85% IBW for an additional 3 months. Seven participants remained above 85% IBW for 6 months. Those 7 participants were initially oligomenorrheic, and all resumed normal menses during the course of treatment.

CONCLUSION: Patients with or at risk for AN can be effectively cared for by a family physician with a multidisciplinary team, applying a family-based approach to treatment.


Corresponding Author(s)

 Richard Terry, DO, MBA, Assistant Dean of Regional Clinical Education, LECOM Elmira Clinical Campus, Elmira, NY.

E-mail address: rterry@lecom.edu.

Read the article

Eating disorders encompass a spectrum of illnesses rang-ing from anorexia nervosa (AN) to bulimia nervosa (BN)and are found most commonly among adolescent and young adult females. Both conditions can cause significant morbidity and mortality.1-4In fact, AN carries the highest mortality rate among all of the psychiatric disorders.4,5AN is a devastating disorder characterized by a person’s refusal to maintain ideal body weight (IBW), amenorrhea, fear of gaining weight, and denial of illness with disturbance of body image. In addition, individuals with AN often exhibit cognitive distortions such as obsessive thinking, perfectionism, and negative self-worth.6-8The medical complications of AN involve multiple organ systems. These individuals often have electrolyte imbalances and nutrient deficiencies caused by restriction of intake, laxative use, and self-induced vomiting. Failure to maintain healthy body weight can also lead to osteopenia, which is potentially irreversible despite weight restoration.5,9-11

Patients at risk for the development of AN include those with a myriad of unhealthy weight-control behaviors (including self-induced vomiting, laxative or diuretic use, excessive exercise, and restriction of food intake); obsessive thoughts about food, weight, or exercise; preoccupation with body image; and low body mass index (BMI).12,13 patients with eating disorders.22,23

The Maudsley Method, a manualized, family-based treatment, has shown to be superior to an individual approach to the treatment of AN, especially in patients under 19 years old with duration of illness under three years.14,18,24-27

The Maudsley Method encompasses a 3-phase, multidisciplinary treatment model for the treatment of anorexia nervosa, focusing on restoration of a healthy weight (>85%

IBW) to reverse and/or prevent the medical complications of starvation and malnutrition. The first phase aims to restore the adolescent to a healthy weight. This phase relies on placing the responsibility of refeeding with the parents. The second phase aims to return responsibility of eating back to the adolescent. The third and final phase aims to reframe distorted thinking, restore relationships, and encourage the creation of identity and autonomy associated with adolescence.

In this study, the investigators adapted the Maudsley Method to the treatment of eating disorders in a family practice residency clinic. The objective of the study was to demonstrate that a family physician with a multidisciplinary team, using a family-based approach, could successfully treat patients with and at risk for anorexia nervosa.

‌Methods

A retrospective chart review was completed and included 9 young women aged 13 to 17 from a family practice residency eating disorder clinic. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of AN or ED-NOS in patients identified as at risk for AN (ie, below IBW, self-induced vomiting, restricted in-

take, laxative or diuretic use) and age <18 years. In addition, the investigators required parents or guardians of the

adolescents to be present for each appointment and engaged in the treatment. Data obtained in the chart review include age, gender, weight, height, presence or absence of menses, and the number of eating disorder–related office visits.

The participants in this study attended an eating disorder clinic that takes place monthly at the family practice residency clinic with a treatment team consisting of a family physician, a registered nurse, a nutritionist, and a social worker. The core members of the treatment team were the same each month, maximizing the consistency for patient care. The clinic also serves as a training site for family practice residents and medical students.

This research was reviewed and approved by an institutional review board.


‌Results

to be >85% IBW but below IBW (participants E, F, G, and H). The 3 remaining participants (33%) were found to be at

or above IBW but were at risk for AN (eg, restriction of intake, purging behaviors, or reported history of AN) (par- ticipants A, B, and C). One subject who was initially >85%

IBW, but below IBW, fell to <85% IBW during treatment

in the clinic. She did not consistently attend the clinic and


‌Table 1 Individual weight statistics at initial visit and at the 3- and 6-month visits after attainment of 85% IBW


Subject

Initial weight (kg)

Lowest weight (kg)

Weight when

>85% IBW (kg)

Weight at 3 months (kg)

Weight at 6 months (kg)

% Weight gain at 3 months (kg)

% Weight gain at 6 months (kg)

A

57.7

57.7

57.7

63.6

66.8

10%

16%

B

46.4

46.4

46.4

50.5

51.8

9%

12%

C

47.7

47.7

47.7

50.5

49.5

6%

4%

D

36.4

36.4

40.0

45.9

44.1

26%

21%

E

43.6

43.6

43.6

50.0

55.0

15%

26%

F

37.3

31.8

No data*

No data*

No data*

No data*

No data*

G

46.8

45.9

46.8

47.3

46.4

1%

-1%

H

43.0

42.3

43.0

47.3

No data†

10%

No data†

I

38.2

38.2

39.6

41.4

44.6

8%

17%

*No data available because subject did not achieve 85% IBW.

No data available because subject moved away before 6-month follow-up.


Table 2 Summary of weight statistics for all participants



Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Initial weight (kg) (n = 8)

36.4

57.7

45.0

Lowest weight (kg) (n = 8)

36.4

57.7

44.8

Weight when achieved 85% IBW (kg) (n = 8)

39.6

57.7

45.6

Weight 3 months after attainment of 85% IBW (kg) (n = 8)

41.4

63.6

49.6

Weight 6 months after attainment of 85% IBW (kg) (n = 7)

44.1

66.8

51.2

Weight gain 3 months after attainment of 85% IBW (%) (n = 8)

1.0

26.0

10.6

Weight gain 6 months after attainment of 85% IBW (%) (n = 7)

-1.0

26.0

13.6






ultimately dropped out of the program (subject F). After attainment of 85% IBW, 8 participants maintained 85% IBW for 3 months and 7 participants maintained 85% IBW for 6 months. One subject (subject H) moved away from the area just before a 6-month follow-up.

For the participants with data at 3 months’ postattain- ment of 85% IBW (n = 8), the average weight gain from their initial weight was 4.59 kg (p = 0.002), and the average weight gain from their lowest weight was 4.79 kg (p = 0.001), with a mean percent weight gain (initial to 6 months) of 10.71% (p = 0.012). For the participants with data at 6 months’ postattainment of 85% IBW (n = 7), the average weight gain from their initial weight was 5.91 kg (p = 0.009), and the average weight gain from their lowest weight was 6.04 kg (p = 0.006), with a mean percent weight gain (initial to 6 months) of 13.57% (p = 0.009).

Menstrual records were also obtained for each subject.

All participants were initially oligomenorrheic, and all par- ticipants who remained in the program resumed normal menses by 6 months.


Discussion

The current study demonstrated that delivery of care by a family physician with a multidisciplinary team using a family-based treatment approach can be successful for pa- tients with or at risk for AN. It is well documented that early intervention for patients with eating disorders or those at risk for eating disorders demonstrates a positive impact on disease progression, including quicker recovery time and fewer long-term physiological and psychological sequelae. A family physician with no additional special training in eating disorders, but with an understanding of the Maudsley Method, can make the diagnosis and intervene promptly. Our study demonstrated considerable success with this ap-

proach because patients had an average weight gain of 13% from baseline to the 6-month follow-up after attainment of 85% IBW, and all patients who remained in the study resumed normal menses.

Our study was strictly observational using a retrospective chart review, and there are a number of improvements that merit further exploration. First, the primary measures of out- come in this study were weight gain and resumption of normal menses. The study lacked consistent assessment of psychosocial status and needs. The psychosocial assessment is a key component of the multidisciplinary approach to care and should be included in the planning and development of a clinic focusing on management of eating disorders. Sec- ond, the investigators applied components of the Maudsley Method, namely emphasis on family involvement and use of a team approach, but did not follow the pure, manualized treatment method, because of constraints on available time, space, and staff. This study does illustrate positive outcomes related to family involvement in and a team approach to treatment, but it does not provide information on the effi- cacy of the Maudsley Method itself. More investigation into the use of the Maudsley Method in a variety of settings is merited. Third, the clinic sees patients of all ages and all forms of eating disorders, the minority of which are ado- lescents with or at risk for AN, and even fewer who have families engaged in treatment.


Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that patients with AN or those at risk for AN can be effectively cared for by a family physi- cian with a multidisciplinary team applying a family-based approach to treatment.


References

  1. Herzog DB, Nussbaum KM, Marmor AK: Comorbidity and outcome in eating disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 19:843-859, 1996

  2. Keski-Rahkonen A, Hoek HW, Susser ES, et al: Epidemiology and course of anorexia nervosa in the community. Am J Psychiatry 164: 1259-1265, 2007

  3. Nielsen S: Epidemiology and mortality of eating disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 24:201-214, 2001


  4. Sullivan PF: Mortality in anorexia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry 152: 1073-1074, 1995

  5. Walsh BT: Eating disorders. In: Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 17th ed. 2008. Available at: http://www.accessmedicine. com. Accessed June 1, 2011.

  6. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed, text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

  7. International Classification of Diseases: Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders, 10th Revision. 2007. Online version available at: http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online. Accessed June 1, 2011.

  8. Garner DM: Pathogenesis of anorexia nervosa. Lancet 341:1631- 1635,1993

  9. Attia E, Walsh BT: Treatment in psychiatry: anorexia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry 164:1805-1810, 2007

  10. Lewis EL, Sbrocco T: Eating disorders. In: Current Diagnosis and Treatment in Family Medicine. 2nd ed. 2008. Available at: http:// www.accessmedicine.com. Accessed June 1, 2011.

  11. Treasure J, Serpell L: Osteoporosis in young people. Research and treatment in eating disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 24:359-370, 2001

  12. Fairburn CG, Cooper Z, Doll HA, et al: Identifying dieters who will develop an eating disorder: a prospective, population-based study. Am J Psychiatry 162:2249-2255, 2005

  13. Golden NH, Katzman DK, Kreipe RE, et al. Eating disorders in adolescents: position paper of the society for adolescent medicine. J Adolesc Health 33:496-503, 2003

  14. Eisler I, Dare C, Hodes M, et al: Family therapy for adolescent anorexia nervosa: the results of a controlled comparison of two family interventions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 41:727-736, 2000

  15. Pritts SD, Susman J: Diagnosis of eating disorders in primary care. Am

    Fam Physician 67:297-304, 2003

  16. Rome ES, Ammerman S, Rosen DS, et al: Children and adolescents with eating disorders: the state of the art. Pediatrics 111:e98-e108, 2003

  17. Steinhausen HC: The outcome of anorexia nervosa in the 20th century.

    Am J Psychiatry 159:1284-1293, 2002

  18. Wallis A, Rhodes P, Kohn M, et al: Five-years of family based treatment for anorexia nervosa: the Maudsley model at the Children’s Hospital at Westmead. Int J Adolesc Med Health 19:277-283, 2007

  19. American Psychiatric Association Work Group on Eating Disorders: Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders (revision). Am J Psychiatry 157(1 suppl):1-39, 2000

  20. Becker AE, Grinspoon SK, Klibanski A, et al: Eating disorders. N Engl J Med 340:1092-1098, 1999

  21. Walsh JM, Wheat ME, Freund K: Detection, evaluation, and treatment of eating disorders: the role of the primary care physician. J Gen Intern Med 15:577-590, 2000

  22. Aamc R: Medical home concept gains momentum. 2008. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/march08/medicalhome.htm. Accessed June 12, 2011.

  23. Backer LA: Building the case for the patient-centered medical home. Fam Pract Manag 16:14-18, 2009

  24. Le Grange D, Binford R, Loeb KL: Manualized family-based treat- ment for anorexia nervosa: a case series. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 44:41-46, 2005

  25. Le Grange D, Eisler I, Dare C, et al: Evaluation of family treatments in adolescent anorexia nervosa: a pilot study. Int J Eat Disord 12:347- 357, 1992

  26. Loeb KL, Walsh BT, Lock J, et al: Open trial of family-based treat- ment for full and partial anorexia nervosa in adolescence: evidence of successful dissemination. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46: 792-800, 2007

  27. Rhodes P: The Maudsley model of family therapy for children and adolescents with anorexia nervosa: theory, clinical practice, and em- pirical support. Aus N Zeal J Fam Ther. 24(4):191-198, 2003